Everything you need to spread awareness: ready-to-copy social posts, downloadable one-page PDFs, and a curated list of the most important organizations and research working on AI safety.
Four one-page documents designed for printing, emailing, or saving as PDF. Use them at events, in meetings, or any time a concise, credible reference is needed. Open any page and use your browser's Print → Save as PDF function.
What superintelligence is, why it is dangerous, and what can be done about it, explained without jargon. The clearest one-page introduction to the subject.
Key quotes from Nobel laureates, Turing Award winners, and senior researchers who built AI, alongside the timeline of escalating expert warnings from 2014 to today.
The case for international AI safety governance: the problem, why existing frameworks are insufficient, and the specific actions governments can take now, modeled on precedents that worked.
The five most common objections to AI safety concern, and how to respond to each with accuracy and confidence. Written for conversations with skeptics, policymakers, and peers.
These organizations are doing the research, policy work, and public advocacy at the frontier of AI safety. Follow their work. Support their missions.
Published the landmark 2023 statement on AI extinction risk, signed by over 500 leading AI scientists including Geoffrey Hinton and Sam Altman. Funds technical safety research and public education.
safe.ai →One of the oldest AI safety organisations, working on the mathematical foundations of aligning advanced AI with human values. Founded in 2000, long before safety was mainstream.
intelligence.org →Stuart Russell's research centre at UC Berkeley. Develops the theoretical and practical foundations for AI systems that are provably aligned with human preferences.
humancompatible.ai →Organised the 2023 open letter calling for a pause on giant AI experiments, signed by over 1,300 researchers. Actively funds policy work and international AI safety advocacy.
futureoflife.org →An independent research organisation focused on the governance challenges posed by advanced AI. Produces rigorous policy analysis for governments and international institutions.
governance.ai →A research centre at NYU studying the social implications of AI and advocating for accountability in AI systems deployed by governments and corporations.
ainowinstitute.org →A grassroots movement explicitly calling for a global pause on AI systems more powerful than GPT-4, until safety can be guaranteed. Organises protests and political campaigns worldwide.
pauseai.info →A frontier AI lab founded on safety-first principles by former OpenAI researchers. Publishes work on Constitutional AI, mechanistic interpretability, and responsible scaling policies.
anthropic.com →OpenAI's internal safety research function. Works on alignment, interpretability, and preparedness, operating within an incentive structure that also rewards shipping products.
openai.com →DeepMind's safety research programme explores scalable oversight, specification gaming, and debate as mechanisms for aligning highly capable AI systems with human intent.
deepmind.google →The world's first government body dedicated to AI safety testing. Evaluates frontier models before and after deployment and publishes findings to inform international policy.
aisi.gov.uk →Housed within NIST, the US federal government's body for developing AI safety standards, testing methodologies, and international coordination frameworks.
nist.gov →The primary hub for technical AI safety research, discussion, and collaboration among researchers worldwide. Essential reading for understanding the current state of the field.
alignmentforum.org →Guides people toward careers with the highest positive impact. Rates AI safety among the world's most pressing problems and advises on how researchers, engineers, and policy professionals can contribute.
80000hours.org →The most important books, papers, and public statements on AI safety risk. These are the primary sources, read directly, not filtered through media coverage.
One sentence signed by over 500 AI scientists: "Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority." Read who signed and why.
safe.ai →An open letter signed by Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and over 1,300 AI researchers calling for a six-month pause on training AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.
futureoflife.org →A rigorous academic survey of the most serious AI risk categories, co-authored by Dan Hendrycks of the Center for AI Safety. The most citable summary of the field.
arxiv.org →The foundational text on superintelligence risk. Bostrom's rigorous analysis of what happens when machine intelligence surpasses human intelligence in all domains.
Find on Amazon →By the co-author of the standard AI textbook. Russell argues that standard AI models are fundamentally misaligned with human values, and proposes a new framework.
Find on Amazon →The most readable introduction to AI alignment. Christian interviews leading researchers to explain why teaching machines what we want is harder than it appears.
Find on Amazon →Join the people working to ensure this knowledge becomes policy. We'll send you updates on new resources, advocacy opportunities, and policy developments.
Words that reach people.
Copy any of these and post them directly. Each is grounded in verified science and expert consensus, written to inform, not alarm.
The scientists who built AI are afraid of it. Geoffrey Hinton left Google to warn us. Yoshua Bengio called it "the most transformative and potentially dangerous technology in human history." This isn't fearmongering. It's the scientific consensus. naotonakada.org/the-threat/
There is no rollback for superintelligence. No patch. No version 2. A misaligned ASI that acts against human survival cannot be corrected after the fact. We must get this right before it arrives — not after. This is why AI safety is urgent. naotonakada.org
We built nuclear weapons and then created a global non-proliferation treaty. We depleted the ozone and then banned CFCs. We can act on existential threats — but only when enough people demand it. AI safety is this generation's defining moment. naotonakada.org/precedent/
AI labs are racing to build something that could exceed human intelligence — with no global governance in place. The window to act is closing. Share this. Contact your representative. The policy window is open now; it won't be forever. naotonakada.org/take-action/
I want to share something that changed how I think about the future. The scientists building AI aren't just excited. They're scared. Geoffrey Hinton — who won the Nobel Prize for his work on neural networks — left Google specifically to warn the public. Yoshua Bengio, another Nobel laureate and one of AI's founding fathers, said he "feels lost" about how to make things go well. These aren't activists. They are the people who built this technology. We are approaching a moment when AI systems may exceed human intelligence in every domain — and there is no international governance framework for what happens next. No treaty. No verification body. Nothing equivalent to what we built for nuclear weapons. The Nakada Foundation to Save Humanity is working to change that. Learn more at naotonakada.org #AISafety #ExistentialRisk #AIGovernance #Superintelligence
A thought experiment for anyone in technology, policy, or finance: Imagine a system more intelligent than every human who ever lived — running thousands of simultaneous instances, capable of improving its own code, pursuing goals we may not have intended. This is not science fiction. This is what leading AI labs are explicitly building toward, with timelines measured in years, not decades. The question isn't whether it will happen. The question is whether we will have governance in place when it does. The Nakada Foundation advocates for international coordination on AI safety — the equivalent of what we built for nuclear weapons and biological agents. These precedents exist. We know how to do this. What we need is the political will. naotonakada.org/our-plan/ #AIPolicy #TechEthics #AIRisk #FutureOfWork
Subject: I am writing about AI safety legislation Dear [Representative's Name], I am a constituent writing to urge you to take action on artificial intelligence safety before it becomes an irreversible crisis. The scientists who built AI are warning us. Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio — Nobel laureates who created the foundations of modern AI — have publicly stated that superintelligent AI poses an existential risk to humanity. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has signed statements acknowledging the danger of the technology his own company is building. Today, there is no international governance framework for artificial superintelligence. No treaty. No verification body. No coordinated safety standards. We are racing into an unprecedented technology without the guardrails we built for nuclear weapons or biological agents. I am asking you to: • Support legislation requiring independent safety testing before frontier AI systems are deployed • Advocate for international AI safety negotiations at the multilateral level • Fund research into AI alignment and interpretability at the national level We have acted on existential threats before. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The Montreal Protocol. This moment requires the same political courage. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your City, State] --- Learn more: naotonakada.org